Republican Presidential Candidate: Chris Christie

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie joined the Republican race for President on June 30, 2015.  He’s been Governor since 2009, a rare Republican in overwhelmingly ‘blue’ New Jersey.

Christie won election, and a second term, by being the kind of politician the people of New Jersey want- someone who’s at the liberal end of the spectrum.

Christie’s had some success on Budget issues.  Christie’s said that small cuts to the federal budget aren’t a concern, and cut over a billion from the state budget upon taking office, declaring a fiscal state of emergency.  Unfortunately, the state’s bond rating has dropped to the 2nd lowest in the nation, he’s borrowed money from the Turnpike toll account to cover other spending, possibly resulting in a gas tax hike, and he spent over $80,000 in taxpayer funds to entertain guests at sporting events.

Education is probably Christie’s strong point.  He backs school choice, supports merit pay for teachers along with vouchers for private schools, and has expanded the number of charter schools.  Unfortunately, he’s also backed Common Core standards (possibly changing his mind here).

Gov. Christie backs NSA surveillance, supported the nomination of Sonya Sotomayor to the US Supreme Court, and nominated numerous liberals for the state Supreme Court.

He campaigned on reducing the power of the state Department of Environmental Protection, arguing it was ‘killing business’, supports nuclear energy in the US, and would work to lift the ban on crude oil exports.  Unfortunately, he also would ban new coal fired power plants, backs tax credits for wind energy, and supports the Obama administration’s climate rules.

While he has no Foreign Policy experience, largely due to his position as governor, I can back him in some of what he’s said.  He’s come out strongly in support of Israel, & strongly opposes the Iran nuclear deal.

When it comes to Free Markets, Christie’s very weak.  While he did propose a regulatory moratorium and a program of eliminating one regulation for each new one during the most recent GOP debate, his history isn’t as good.  He provided over $4 billion in corporate tax breaks, gave millions in incentives to a casino which ultimately failed, provided over $100 million in tax breaks to Subaru to move to Camden, and blocked Tesla Motors ‘direct sales’ model in the state.

Typically, Immigration is another weak area for the Governor.  On the plus side, he’s said we may need to re-examine the 14th Amendment & the ‘birthright citizenship‘ issue.  He’s also suggested we monitor & track immigrants much like FedEx tracks packages.   On the other hand, he’s called for ‘fairness’ in treatment of illegals, signed & supported a state ‘Dream’ Act, and appointed a US Senator who’s pro amnesty.

Christie’s track record on the 2nd Amendment is poor, too.  While he did veto measures proposed by the state legislature, he’s also claimed the state has a ‘handgun problem‘, and has backed gun control for many years.

And on the economy, I’d give Christie a mixed record.  He’s said that unions are a problem in the state, conditionally vetoed an increase in the state minimum wage, vetoed legislation which would ultimately have raised construction costs after Hurricane Sandy and supported some tax reforms.  On the other hand, he’s now considering supporting an increase in the federal minimum wage to $10/hour,  backs ‘prevailing wage’ laws, and leads a state with high property & income taxes and a struggling economy.

Sorry Gov. Christie.  You don’t have my backing for 2016.

As always, I got my information from the Conservative Review website, and their associated links.

Next profile:  Marco Rubio

Posted in 2016 Presidential Race, Conservatism, Politics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Republican Presidential Candidate: Jeb Bush

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, brother of George W Bush & son of George H.W. Bush entered the race on June 15.  Source for this material is

While in the Governor’s Mansion from 1999 to 2007, Bush had a fairly conservative track record.  He pushed for conservative education reform, expanded 2nd Amendment rights, and shrank the number of earmarks.  He kept Florida’s credit rating strong, and backed a Balanced Budget Amendment to the US Constitution.

At the same time, though, the budget grew over 30% under his watch, debt increased over 60% (pg 9), general spending rose over 55%, and used tax money to subsidize private businesses.

On education, Bush backed a plan which provided more public/private school choice options, helped kids with learning disabilities get scholarships to the school of their parent’s choice, and is a backer of charter schools.

But he’s a backer of Common Core, and a ‘free 2 year community college‘ plan similar to President Obama’s.

Bush is weak on the environment too.  While Governor of Florida, Bush acquired over 1 million acres of land for preservation, converted about a million acres of farm & natural land to housing areas, & spent nearly $2 billion to clean up the Everglades.  He also at least appears to be a supporter of ‘Cap & Trade’, opposed drilling off Florida’s coast, and received praise from Tom Steyer, a radical environmentalist, for his work on ‘Climate Change’.

On the plus side, he not only supports fracking, he believes states, not the federal government, should regulate the practice.

Governors, of course, have limited power over foreign affairs.  Bush’s stance on these issues is mixed.  While he opposes the Obama administration move to normalize relations with Cuba, and supports strong sanctions against Iran, and backs Israel, I have concerns over other comments he’s made.

He won’t tear up the Iran deal immediately , and wants to bring American ideals to other countries which don’t have a history of freedom.  While nice in theory, it’s this type of idea which has resulted in leadership & laws hostile towards liberty.

His record on free markets is mixed as well.   He did eliminate penalties for reselling tickets, and signed a bill which prohibited using Eminent Domain to increase the tax base.  He also recently came out against re-authorizing the Export-Import Bank, and opposes a federal minimum wage.

On the other hand, Bush spent $100 million tax dollars to subsidize ‘green’ energy, backed ‘TARP’, supports extending wind tax credits, and spent over $600 million in subsidies to private businesses.

Jeb’s record on immigration is terrible.  He backs a ‘path to citizenship’ for those who came here illegally, supports granting ‘in state’ tuition to illegal immigrants, and opposes any changes to the birthright citizenship  misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment.

Typically, there’s a mixed record on the 2nd Amendment as well.  On the plus side, he signed ‘Stand Your Ground’ legislation and strengthened Concealed Carry laws for Florida residents.  He does, though, support background checks even for private firearm sales.

Bush’s record on the economy may be his strongest selling point.  He wants a flatter tax system with fewer loopholes, backs ‘right to work’ laws, opposes federal wage controls (also), saw an increase in employment of nearly 20% during his term in office, and reduced taxes by nearly $20 billion.

While Bush may not be the worst candidate Republicans could field based on economic issues, his family ties to George W Bush, his atrocious record on immigration and questionable statements on nearly every other issue we’re facing in America means I can’t back Jeb.

Next up:  NJ Governor Chris Christie


Posted in 2016 Presidential Race, Conservatism, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Republican Presidential candidate: Donald Trump

Real estate developer Donald Trump entered the Presidential race on June 16.

Right now, Trump is leading the Republican field.  He’s playing the role of an outsider, and he’s certainly not your typical Presidential candidate.  So what do we know about ‘The Donald’?

On the plus side, he’d work to eliminate, or at least greatly reduce, the Department of Education.  He’s a supporter of school choice, charter schools, and vouchers.  He potentially sees a federal role in coordination of education, a strike in my opinion.

He’s got a mixed view on immigration issues.  He wants to build a wall, paid for by Mexico, to cut illegal immigration (good luck on that!).  While he’s recently said he wants to end birthright citizenship, a 2013 NBCLatino story reports that he was ‘convinced’ by meeting with illegal immigrants who want immigration reform (often a code word for ‘amnesty’).  He’d also accept some Syrian refugees on a ‘humanitarian’ basis, regardless of potential security risks.

Trump opposes the Iran nuclear deal, believes President Obama is bad for Israel, and believes arming the Syrian rebels was a bad idea.  At the same time, though, he’s said he wouldn’t necessarily trash the Iran deal right away, and would renegotiate it.

Trump calls Global Warming ‘BS‘, supports developing nuclear power, opposes cap & trade & tax credits for wind energy.  He’s also come out in favor of a renewable fuel (ethanol) mandate.

He’s also come out in favor of cuts to federal programs (and here), and backs lower taxes on capital gains, but has also backed a tax increase on the rich.

His record on the 2nd Amendment is mixed.  While he thinks banning guns would be a bad idea, he also thinks Republicans need to be more flexible.

On the free market, Trump is pretty weak.  He’s a backer of the infamous Kelo decision (near bottom of linked article), which allowed government to seize private property not for things like roads or police stations, but for private development which would increase tax revenue to the government.  Recently he said that Eminent Domain allows people to get more for their property than it’s worth, but fails to accept that people have their roots there.  It’s their home, their property being taken for private, not public use.  Trump also supported Obama’s 2009 stimulus (about half way down page), and backed the 2008 auto bailouts.

He opposes Obamacare, but still wants some kind of universal health care (about half way down).  In 2000, he said “I’m a conservative on most issues but a liberal on health. It is an unacceptable but accurate fact that the number of uninsured Americans has risen to 42 million. Working out detailed plans will take time. But the goal should be clear: Our people are our greatest asset. We must take care of our own. We must have universal healthcare.

Our objective [should be] to make reforms for the moment and, longer term, to find an equivalent of the single-payer plan that is affordable, well-administered, and provides freedom of choice. Possible? The good news is, yes. There is already a system in place-the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program-that can act as a guide for all healthcare reform. It operates through a centralized agency that offers considerable range of choice. While this is a government program, it is also very much market-based. It allows 620 private insurance companies to compete for this market. Once a year participants can choose from plans which vary in benefits and costs.  Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.206-208 & 218 , Jul 2, 2000

On the other hand, he’s willing to reform our Social Security system, saying “Allow every American to dedicate some portion of their payroll taxes to a personal Social Security account that they could own and invest in stocks and bonds… Directing Social Security funds into personal accounts invested in real assets would swell national savings, pumping hundreds of billions of dollars into jobs and the economy. These investments would boost national investment, productivity, wages, and future economic growth.” (The America We Deserve)

So what’s my take on Donald Trump?  In many ways, he certainly talks a good game.  He’s creating a huge amount of buzz, and is getting plenty of attention, both positive & negative.  While I think he’s often right on some issues such as education, immigration, the environment and spending, I strongly disagree with his stance on Kelo, universal health care (although his plan may not be as bad as what we’d get with a Bernie Sanders or a Hillary Clinton) and taxes.  And while I like his honesty, he often comes across as bombastic.  Some of what he says can be portrayed as anti-immigrant and anti-Hispanic, despite the fact that he’s against illegal immigration.

Would I vote for him?  He certainly isn’t my first choice.  Or even my 2nd.  But I’d be at least a bit more willing to vote for him in the general election than some of his opponents.

Posted in 2016 Presidential Race, Politics | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Republican Presidential candidate: John Kasich

Ohio Gov. John Kasich entered the race on July 21.  He’s served in that capacity since 2011, and served in the US House as well, where his focus was on balancing the federal budget.  He also ran for the White House in 2000.  My source is

Kasich’s track record on budget issues are mixed.  While in the House, he fought to reduce spending.  Unfortunately, that hasn’t carried over to his time in the Governor’s mansion.  While he reduced spending at first, his more recent proposals have included a 40% increase in the general budget.  He’s ranked at the bottom of Republican governors for fiscal responsibility by the Cato Institute, and even scored lower than eight Democratic governors.

He’s supported banning federal funds from going to schools which discriminate against religious meetings, backed federal term limits, supported ending federal funds for presidential campaigns, and backed a 1998 proposal for a religious freedom amendment to the Constitution.

He’s reasonably good on educational issues.  While he backed an amendment in 1992 which directed a portion of federal grants be used for school choice programs, and backed a 1998 bill which started a school choice program in the District of Columbia, he’s also a backer of Common Core.

He backed elevating the EPA to a Cabinet level office in 1990 & believes that AGW is a real concern, he’s also supported rolling back renewable energy requirements & told radio talk show host Sean Hannity that Obama’s cap & trade policies would be harmful.

Kasich was a backer of the 2000 Medicare ‘Part D’ plan (the prescription drug plan), and backed an expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare, saying that such care is, in essence, required of Christians.  Sorry John- the poor are far better served through charity, not bloated, wasteful government programs.  And are better served by helping as many as possible of them to find jobs which allow them to provide for themselves.

He’s also a backer of amnesty or a ‘path to citizenship‘ for illegal immigrants.  He also has a fundamental misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment, as many do, saying “Let these people who are born here be citizens, and that’s the end of it.”

Kasich’s support for the 2nd Amendment is weak as well.  While he voted against the Brady Bill and the Omnibus Crime Control Act of 1991, he also voted against removing provisions of a bill which would have required a waiting period for handguns.

John Kasich sees himself as a ‘compassionate conservative’, in the mold of George H W Bush.

I have too many questions about Kasich to be able to back him.  He’s too moderate on too many issues.  I think he’d be another middle of the road type.  Someone the ‘Establishment’ likes.  Sorry, John.  You don’t have my vote.

Posted in 2016 Presidential Race, Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Reblog: Wilderness of Mirrors Conservatives vs the Republican Party

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Republican Presidential candidate: Carly Fiorina

Carly Fiorina, former Hewlett Packard CEO, was in the first debate- the ‘minor leaguer’ debate.  Because of her performance, she’s seen a steady increase in her support.  My source is

A plus for her is that she’s not a career politician.  She ran for the US Senate from California in 2010 and lost.

But she doesn’t seem to have outlined specifics of what she’d do, or how she’d fix the problems we’re facing as a nation.

So where does Ms. Fiorina stand on the important issues?

While she has criticized Common Core standards, she still wants to see the federal government take more of a role in educating America’s youth.

She backed the TARP bailout & Obama’s stimulus package, although she says she now opposes TARP.  She hasn’t specifically backed cap & trade, but at least appears to support it.

Ms. Fiorina also supports ‘birthright citizenship’, supposedly granted under the 14th Amendment.  (see my post on Immigration)  She also backed the ‘Dream Act’, and the ‘Gang of Eight’ push for amnesty for illegal immigrants.

She at least appears to be a supporter of the 2nd Amendment.

On the environment, she opposes the renewable fuel standards & the wind energy tax credit, and blames the left for water shortages in California.  On the other hand, she blames human activity for ‘Climate Change’, and appears to back cap & trade.

According to ‘The Examiner‘, Carly Fiornia is another moderate to liberal, running as a conservative.

Because of her stance on issues, and her poor performance while at HP, I’d have a very hard time backing Ms. Fiorina for the White House.  I’d much rather see a woman like Nikki Haley or Susanna Martinez run.  Or, in a few years, Mia Love.

Posted in 2016 Presidential Race, Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Republican Presidential candidate: Lindsey Graham

Republicans have a huge number of candidates to choose from in the upcoming Presidential primaries.  I’d like to offer my opinions on them.

Lindsey Graham, Senator from South Carolina, is one of the candidates I can safely say I will never support in the primaries.  I’m not even sure I could back him in the General Election.

According to the American Conservative Union, Graham scored just 74% ‘Conservative’ in the most recent Congress.  This was an increase over his previous session score of 68%.  While his lifetime (20 years) score is reasonably good (87.3%), he seems to be getting more & more liberal as time goes on- something we see from far too many of our Republican representatives.

The website ‘Conservative Review‘ ranks him at just 47% Conservative.  This score is based on his support for ‘fast track’ trade authority for President Obama, supporting Obama’s nomination of Loretta Lynch for Attorney General, and his backing of funding to pay for Obama’s executive amnesty among others.  In the past, he’s supported numerous bailouts, backed comprehensive immigration reform, been weak on 2nd Amendment issues, and backed raising the debt ceiling a total of 10 times.  More of the Conservative Review analysis here.

Sorry Lindsey, you seem to be far too much in Obama’s pocket for my taste!

Posted in 2016 Presidential Race | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment