Republican Presidential candidate: Donald Trump

Real estate developer Donald Trump entered the Presidential race on June 16.

Right now, Trump is leading the Republican field.  He’s playing the role of an outsider, and he’s certainly not your typical Presidential candidate.  So what do we know about ‘The Donald’?

On the plus side, he’d work to eliminate, or at least greatly reduce, the Department of Education.  He’s a supporter of school choice, charter schools, and vouchers.  He potentially sees a federal role in coordination of education, a strike in my opinion.

He’s got a mixed view on immigration issues.  He wants to build a wall, paid for by Mexico, to cut illegal immigration (good luck on that!).  While he’s recently said he wants to end birthright citizenship, a 2013 NBCLatino story reports that he was ‘convinced’ by meeting with illegal immigrants who want immigration reform (often a code word for ‘amnesty’).  He’d also accept some Syrian refugees on a ‘humanitarian’ basis, regardless of potential security risks.

Trump opposes the Iran nuclear deal, believes President Obama is bad for Israel, and believes arming the Syrian rebels was a bad idea.  At the same time, though, he’s said he wouldn’t necessarily trash the Iran deal right away, and would renegotiate it.

Trump calls Global Warming ‘BS‘, supports developing nuclear power, opposes cap & trade & tax credits for wind energy.  He’s also come out in favor of a renewable fuel (ethanol) mandate.

He’s also come out in favor of cuts to federal programs (and here), and backs lower taxes on capital gains, but has also backed a tax increase on the rich.

His record on the 2nd Amendment is mixed.  While he thinks banning guns would be a bad idea, he also thinks Republicans need to be more flexible.

On the free market, Trump is pretty weak.  He’s a backer of the infamous Kelo decision (near bottom of linked article), which allowed government to seize private property not for things like roads or police stations, but for private development which would increase tax revenue to the government.  Recently he said that Eminent Domain allows people to get more for their property than it’s worth, but fails to accept that people have their roots there.  It’s their home, their property being taken for private, not public use.  Trump also supported Obama’s 2009 stimulus (about half way down page), and backed the 2008 auto bailouts.

He opposes Obamacare, but still wants some kind of universal health care (about half way down).  In 2000, he said “I’m a conservative on most issues but a liberal on health. It is an unacceptable but accurate fact that the number of uninsured Americans has risen to 42 million. Working out detailed plans will take time. But the goal should be clear: Our people are our greatest asset. We must take care of our own. We must have universal healthcare.

Our objective [should be] to make reforms for the moment and, longer term, to find an equivalent of the single-payer plan that is affordable, well-administered, and provides freedom of choice. Possible? The good news is, yes. There is already a system in place-the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program-that can act as a guide for all healthcare reform. It operates through a centralized agency that offers considerable range of choice. While this is a government program, it is also very much market-based. It allows 620 private insurance companies to compete for this market. Once a year participants can choose from plans which vary in benefits and costs.  Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.206-208 & 218 , Jul 2, 2000

On the other hand, he’s willing to reform our Social Security system, saying “Allow every American to dedicate some portion of their payroll taxes to a personal Social Security account that they could own and invest in stocks and bonds… Directing Social Security funds into personal accounts invested in real assets would swell national savings, pumping hundreds of billions of dollars into jobs and the economy. These investments would boost national investment, productivity, wages, and future economic growth.” (The America We Deserve)

So what’s my take on Donald Trump?  In many ways, he certainly talks a good game.  He’s creating a huge amount of buzz, and is getting plenty of attention, both positive & negative.  While I think he’s often right on some issues such as education, immigration, the environment and spending, I strongly disagree with his stance on Kelo, universal health care (although his plan may not be as bad as what we’d get with a Bernie Sanders or a Hillary Clinton) and taxes.  And while I like his honesty, he often comes across as bombastic.  Some of what he says can be portrayed as anti-immigrant and anti-Hispanic, despite the fact that he’s against illegal immigration.

Would I vote for him?  He certainly isn’t my first choice.  Or even my 2nd.  But I’d be at least a bit more willing to vote for him in the general election than some of his opponents.

Posted in 2016 Presidential Race, Politics | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Republican Presidential candidate: John Kasich

Ohio Gov. John Kasich entered the race on July 21.  He’s served in that capacity since 2011, and served in the US House as well, where his focus was on balancing the federal budget.  He also ran for the White House in 2000.  My source is ConservativeReview.com.

Kasich’s track record on budget issues are mixed.  While in the House, he fought to reduce spending.  Unfortunately, that hasn’t carried over to his time in the Governor’s mansion.  While he reduced spending at first, his more recent proposals have included a 40% increase in the general budget.  He’s ranked at the bottom of Republican governors for fiscal responsibility by the Cato Institute, and even scored lower than eight Democratic governors.

He’s supported banning federal funds from going to schools which discriminate against religious meetings, backed federal term limits, supported ending federal funds for presidential campaigns, and backed a 1998 proposal for a religious freedom amendment to the Constitution.

He’s reasonably good on educational issues.  While he backed an amendment in 1992 which directed a portion of federal grants be used for school choice programs, and backed a 1998 bill which started a school choice program in the District of Columbia, he’s also a backer of Common Core.

He backed elevating the EPA to a Cabinet level office in 1990 & believes that AGW is a real concern, he’s also supported rolling back renewable energy requirements & told radio talk show host Sean Hannity that Obama’s cap & trade policies would be harmful.

Kasich was a backer of the 2000 Medicare ‘Part D’ plan (the prescription drug plan), and backed an expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare, saying that such care is, in essence, required of Christians.  Sorry John- the poor are far better served through charity, not bloated, wasteful government programs.  And are better served by helping as many as possible of them to find jobs which allow them to provide for themselves.

He’s also a backer of amnesty or a ‘path to citizenship‘ for illegal immigrants.  He also has a fundamental misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment, as many do, saying “Let these people who are born here be citizens, and that’s the end of it.”

Kasich’s support for the 2nd Amendment is weak as well.  While he voted against the Brady Bill and the Omnibus Crime Control Act of 1991, he also voted against removing provisions of a bill which would have required a waiting period for handguns.

John Kasich sees himself as a ‘compassionate conservative’, in the mold of George H W Bush.

I have too many questions about Kasich to be able to back him.  He’s too moderate on too many issues.  I think he’d be another middle of the road type.  Someone the ‘Establishment’ likes.  Sorry, John.  You don’t have my vote.

Posted in 2016 Presidential Race, Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Reblog: Wilderness of Mirrors Conservatives vs the Republican Party

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Republican Presidential candidate: Carly Fiorina

Carly Fiorina, former Hewlett Packard CEO, was in the first debate- the ‘minor leaguer’ debate.  Because of her performance, she’s seen a steady increase in her support.  My source is ConservativeReview.com.

A plus for her is that she’s not a career politician.  She ran for the US Senate from California in 2010 and lost.

But she doesn’t seem to have outlined specifics of what she’d do, or how she’d fix the problems we’re facing as a nation.

So where does Ms. Fiorina stand on the important issues?

While she has criticized Common Core standards, she still wants to see the federal government take more of a role in educating America’s youth.

She backed the TARP bailout & Obama’s stimulus package, although she says she now opposes TARP.  She hasn’t specifically backed cap & trade, but at least appears to support it.

Ms. Fiorina also supports ‘birthright citizenship’, supposedly granted under the 14th Amendment.  (see my post on Immigration)  She also backed the ‘Dream Act’, and the ‘Gang of Eight’ push for amnesty for illegal immigrants.

She at least appears to be a supporter of the 2nd Amendment.

On the environment, she opposes the renewable fuel standards & the wind energy tax credit, and blames the left for water shortages in California.  On the other hand, she blames human activity for ‘Climate Change’, and appears to back cap & trade.

According to ‘The Examiner‘, Carly Fiornia is another moderate to liberal, running as a conservative.

Because of her stance on issues, and her poor performance while at HP, I’d have a very hard time backing Ms. Fiorina for the White House.  I’d much rather see a woman like Nikki Haley or Susanna Martinez run.  Or, in a few years, Mia Love.

Posted in 2016 Presidential Race, Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Republican Presidential candidate: Lindsey Graham

Republicans have a huge number of candidates to choose from in the upcoming Presidential primaries.  I’d like to offer my opinions on them.

Lindsey Graham, Senator from South Carolina, is one of the candidates I can safely say I will never support in the primaries.  I’m not even sure I could back him in the General Election.

According to the American Conservative Union, Graham scored just 74% ‘Conservative’ in the most recent Congress.  This was an increase over his previous session score of 68%.  While his lifetime (20 years) score is reasonably good (87.3%), he seems to be getting more & more liberal as time goes on- something we see from far too many of our Republican representatives.

The website ‘Conservative Review‘ ranks him at just 47% Conservative.  This score is based on his support for ‘fast track’ trade authority for President Obama, supporting Obama’s nomination of Loretta Lynch for Attorney General, and his backing of funding to pay for Obama’s executive amnesty among others.  In the past, he’s supported numerous bailouts, backed comprehensive immigration reform, been weak on 2nd Amendment issues, and backed raising the debt ceiling a total of 10 times.  More of the Conservative Review analysis here.

Sorry Lindsey, you seem to be far too much in Obama’s pocket for my taste!

Posted in 2016 Presidential Race | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

CJ Pearson

I haven’t got any idea who I’ll end up backing for the White House in 2016.  But I already have an idea of who I could easily support for the White House in about 2044.

Young CJ Pearson, a 13 year old from Augusta Georgia, has made a number of youtube videos expressing conservative views, and questioning President Obama’s decisions and even his patriotism.

Even though his parents are Democrats, young CJ has considered himself a conservative since he was 8.   He’s remarkably articulate & astute for someone so young, and while he’s certainly drawn attention for his comments on national issues, his main focus has been on state & local issues, even writing a bill for the state legislature which would lower the minimum age to serve.

I’ll be interested to follow this young man’s future.  Will he disappear like some young conservatives have?  Or will he continue to grow in his beliefs and his influence?  From what I’ve seen so far, I hope for the latter!

Posted in Conservatism, Young conservatives | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Charleston Church Massacre

The massacre of nine innocent men & women at the Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, SC is certainly in part due to the alleged perpetrator’s (I refuse to say his name) hatred of minorities, as evidenced by his online rant.

His hatred seems, at least, to be something that’s developed fairly recently.  A friend of his, who describes himself as ‘half black’ didn’t see indications of racism when they were growing up.

His father & uncle called authorities & positively identified him as the alleged perpetrator, and his uncle said he would ‘push the button himself‘ if the murderer is sentenced to death.

There are calls for this attack to be classified as terrorism.  1   2   3    But FBI director James Corney says that a terrorist act must be politically motivated.

The calls of racism & of a ‘hate crime’ certainly make sense, especially in light of images showing the alleged perpetrator wearing a jacket with a pro-apartheid patch on it2 (scroll about halfway down linked pages), the type of thing that would, in the eyes of the left, make him a member of the Right.  But other pictures show him burning an American flag, and there are expressions of hatred towards American patriotism, hardly actions I’d expect of a Conservative.

Regardless of his motive, regardless of his political leanings, I hope he’s punished to the greatest extent possible, should he be convicted.

 

The response of the community, especially the families of the victims of this senseless act, is so much better and so much more Christ-like than I could be.  I respect them, and offer my prayers to them.

Posted in Charleston, Racism, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment